ULTIMATE HARDWARE = CPU REVIEWS - MOTHERBOARD REVIEWS - PERFORMANCE DATABASE - VIDEO CARD REVIEWS
TECH REVIEWS - EMAIL - BYTE NEWS - RESOURCE - NEWS - SITEMAP - FACEBOOK - MYSPACE - SQUIDOO - TWITTER

S3 SAVAGE3D vs S3 SAVAGE4

"S3 Savage3D vs S3 Savage4 review testing the Diamond Stealth III S540 Savage4 to the Hercules Beast Savage3D. System used for testing was a AMD Duron 750Mhz and JETWAY 663AS Pro. Software used was PC Player Direct3D, Quake 2, Quake 3 Arena and Wintune 1997."

I've always wondered what the difference in performance would be between the 2 different Savage chipsets. The Savage3D was plagued by poor driver support through out it's life. The Savage4 also started out with poor drivers but they have been improved alot since then and it's now one of the better budget video card. To avoid cpu limiting the performance of the video cards the tests are conducted on an AMD Duron 750mhz.

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

PROCESSOR	AMD DURON 750 MHZ
VIDEO CARD	DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO
	HERCULES SAVAGE3D
S3 SAVAGE4 DRIVER	V395_WIN9X_ME_82033
S3 SAVAGE3D DRIVER	TBSTWIN9X102
MOTHERBOARD	JETWAY 663AS PRO
MEMORY	128MB PC-100 SDRAM
OPERATING SYSTEM	WINDOWS 98 SE
DIRECTX VERSION	v8.0a

WINTUNE 97

800x600x16

	91
	117

800x600x32

	55
	58

HERCULES SAVAGE3D DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO

COMMENT - "At 16bit the Savage4 takes an early lead, it's 26mps clear of the Savage3D. At 32bit the Savage3D fights back and comes within 3mps of the Savage4."

PC PLAYER DIRECT3D

640x480x16

	92
	87

640x480x32

	82
	72

1024x768x16

	55
	51

1024x768x32

	40
	41

HERCULES SAVAGE3D DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO

BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Direct3D HAL
Gourad Shading Model
Solid Model
Textures Enabled
Fog Enabled
Dithering Enabled
Antialiasing Enabled
Bilinear Texturing Enabled
Transparent Textures Enabled
Perspective Enabled

COMMENT - "Wow what's this we see, at 640x480x16bit the Savage3D takes the lead by a small margin of 5fps. At 640x480x32bit this lead grows to 10fps, this result was unexpected. Are the Direct3D drivers of the Savage3D better than the Savage4? At 1024x768x16bit once again the Savage3D is beating the Savage4. At 1024x768x32bit it's too close to call. I have to mention the image quality of the Savage3D, it's very poor which probably indicates that the drivers are optimised for speed rather than image quality. No such image quality problems with the Savage4, it's image quality is excellent as always."

QUAKE 2

640x480x16

	47
	77

640x480x32

	33
	70

1024x768x16

	21
	35

1024x768x32

	12
	31

HERCULES SAVAGE3D DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO

BENCHMARK SETTINGS
3dnow OpenGL Driver
Demo1.dm2 benchmark
Fullscreen enabled
Texture Quality Full
8Bit Textures Disabled
Sync Every Frame Disabled

COMMENT - "With Quake 2 the Savage4 takes a huge lead of 30fps at 640x480x16bit. At 640x480x32bit the Savage4 is twice as fast as the Savage3D. With Quake 2 the Savage4 is playable (30fps minimum) at all resolutions tested. However the Savage3D is only really playable at low resolutions, at higher resolutions it's frame rate falls below 30ps which is unplayable."

QUAKE III ARENA

FASTEST

	47
	97

NORMAL

	30
	55

HIGH QUALITY

	N/A
	24

HERCULES SAVAGE3D DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO

COMMENT - "The performance of the Savage video cards are pretty much the same like with Quake 2. The Savage4 takes a huge 50fps lead over the Savage3D at the fastest setting and 25fps at the normal setting. The Savage3D refused to run Quake 3 at high quality so only Savage4 results are available."

BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Default GLdriver
GL Extensions on
Fullscreen on
Demo001 Benchmark

FASTEST QUALITY
512x384 Video Mode
16Bit Colour Depth
16Bit Texture Quality
Vertex Lighting
Geometic Detail Low
Texture Detail 50%
Bilinear Texture Filtering

NORMAL QUALITY
640x480 Video Mode
16Bit Colour Depth
16Bit Texture Quality
Lightmap Lighting
Geometic Detail Medium
Texture Detail 75%
Bilinear Texture Filtering

HIGH QUALITY
800x600 Video Mode
32Bit Colour Depth
32Bit Texture Quality
Lightmap Lighting
High Geometic Detail
Full Texture Detail
Trilinear Texture Filtering

CONCLUSION - "The Savage4 clearly beat the Savage3D which is to be expected. S3 had high hopes for the Savage3D when it was first released, it was plagued with poor driver support and it never recovered. The Savage4 also had poor drivers when it was released but S3 worked very hard and the latest drivers are stable and the performance is very good. 55fps on Quake 3 at 640x480x16bit with max settings is impressive for a budget card. It's not a GeForce beater but for light gaming it's just great, lets not forget that it does 32bit and has S3TC."

LATEST REVIEWS

XFX RADEON HD 5850

"XFX Radeon HD 5850 uses the RV870 GPU at 725Mhz and has 1GB GDDR5 memory running at 4000Mhz. The XFX Radeon HD 5850 has a 256Bit Memory Interface, 1440 Shader Processors and DirectX 11."

INTERNET EXPLORER 9 BETA

"Performance of Microsoft Internet Explorer v9.0 Beta when compared to Microsoft Internet Explorer v8.0 tested with Acid3, Sunspider, V8 Benchmark and Peacekeeper."

ASUS GEFORCE GTX 460

"Asus GeForce GTX 260 uses the GeForce GTX 460 GPU at 675Mhz and has 768MB GDDR5 memory running at 3600Mhz. The Asus GeForce GTX 460 has a 192Bit Memory Interface, 336 Shader Processors and DirectX 11."

MSI GEFORCE GTX 460

"The MSI GeForce GTX 460 uses the Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 GPU at 725Mhz and has 1GB GDDR5 memory running at 3600Mhz. The MSI GeForce GTX 460 has a 256Bit Memory Interface, 336 Shader Processors and DirectX 11."

5 BROWSER BATTLE

"It's the Battle to end all Browser Battles featuring 5 of the Best Browsers such as Google Chrome4, Mozilla Firefox 3.6, Microsoft Internet Explorer 8, Opera 10 and Apple Safari 4."

MEMONEX TECHNOLOGY R310

"Today we are going to be reviewing the Memonex Technology R310 USB Drive against the Sandisk Cruzer Micro USB Drive. The Memonex Technology R310 USB Drive is the generous 32GB version so you will have plenty of space for Images or Movies etc."

GAINWARD GEFORCE GTX 465

"Gainward GeForce GTX 465 review also featuring Asus GeForce GTX 470. Gainward GeForce GTX 465 uses Nvidia GTX 465 GPU operating at 607Mhz with 1024MB GDDR5 Memory running at 3206Mhz."

ASUS GEFORCE GTX 470

"Asus GeForce GTX 470 review also featuring the Zotac GeForce GTX 480. The Asus GeForce GTX 470 uses the Nvidia GTX 470 GPU operating at 607Mhz with 1280MB GDDR5 running at 3348Mhz."

AMD PHENOM II X4 955

"AMD Phenom II X4 955 review also featuring the AMD Phenom II X4 920. The AMD Phenom II X4 955 type Deneb is a Socket AM2+ Processor operating at 3200Mhz."

AMD PHENOM II X4 920

"AMD Phenom II X4 920 review also featuring the AMD Athlon II X2 240. The AMD Phenom II X4 920 type Deneb is a Socket AM2+ Processor operating at 2800Mhz."

HIS RADEON HD 5750

"HIS Radeon HD 5750 review also featuring the Ladybird GeForce GTS 250. The HIS Radeon HD 5750 uses the RV850 GPU running at 700Mhz with 1GB Gddr5 Memory at 4600Mhz with 720 Shader Processors with DX11."

GIGABYTE RADEON HD 5770

"Gigabyte Radeon HD 5770 review also featuring the Gigabyte Radeon HD 4770. The Gigabyte Radeon HD 5770 uses the RV850 GPU running at 850Mhz with 1GB Gddr5 Memory at 4800Mhz with 800 Shader Processors."

HIS RADEON HD 5870

"HIS Radeon HD 5870 review also featuring the Zotac GeForce GTX 480. The HIS Radeon HD 5870 uses the RV850 GPU running at 850Mhz with 1GB Gddr5 Memory at 4800Mhz with 1600 Shader Processors with DX11."

ZOTAC GEFORCE GTX 480

"Zotac GeForce GTX 480 review also featuring the MSI Radeon HD 5970. The Zotac GeForce GTX 480 uses the GTX 480 GPU running at 700Mhz with 1536MB Gddr5 Memory at 3696Mhz with 480 Shader Processors."

SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 5830

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5830 review also featuring the Sapphire Radeon HD 5770. The Sapphire Radeon HD 5830 using the RV850 GPU running at 800Mhz with 1GB Gddr5 Memory at 4000Mhz with 1120 Shader Processors."

XFX RADEON HD 5830

"XFX Radeon HD 5830 uses the Powerful RV850 GPU operating at 800Mhz with 1GB Gddr5 Memory at 4000Mhz with 1120 Advanced Shader Processors with DX11 Support."

AMD ATHLON II X2 240

"The AMD Athlon II X2 240 Processor takes on the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800. AMD Athlon II X2 240 is a powerful 2.8Ghz Regor Socket AM2+ Processor which is compared to the Socket 939 2.4Ghz AMD Athlon64 X2 4800."

S3 SAVAGE3D vs S3 SAVAGE4

"S3 Savage3D vs S3 Savage4 review testing the Diamond Stealth III S540 Savage4 to the Hercules Beast Savage3D. System used for testing was a AMD Duron 750Mhz and JETWAY 663AS Pro. Software used was PC Player Direct3D, Quake 2, Quake 3 Arena and Wintune 1997."

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

WINTUNE 97

COMMENT - "At 16bit the Savage4 takes an early lead, it's 26mps clear of the Savage3D. At 32bit the Savage3D fights back and comes within 3mps of the Savage4."

PC PLAYER DIRECT3D

QUAKE 2

QUAKE III ARENA

COMMENT - "The performance of the Savage video cards are pretty much the same like with Quake 2. The Savage4 takes a huge 50fps lead over the Savage3D at the fastest setting and 25fps at the normal setting. The Savage3D refused to run Quake 3 at high quality so only Savage4 results are available."

LATEST REVIEWS

SEARCH ULTIMATE HARDWARE