ULTIMATE HARDWARE

ULTIMATE HARDWARE = CPU REVIEWS, MOTHERBOARD REVIEWS, PERFORMANCE DATABASE AND VIDEO CARD REVIEWS

3DLABS PERMEDIA2 vs PERMEDIA3

"This is a comparison between the 3DLABS Permedia 2 and 3DLABS Permedia 3. They aren't designed with games in mind but for serious applications, 3D rendering and computer aided design."

3DLABS PERMEDIA 2 AND PERMEDIA 3

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

PROCESSOR AMD DURON 750 MHZ
VIDEO CARD DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO 8MB AGP
3DLABS PERMEDIA3
PERMEDIA2 DRIVER FIREGL1KPRO_W9X_7
PERMEDIA3 DRIVER v21070828R
MOTHERBOARD JETWAY 663AS PRO
MEMORY 256MB PC-133 SDRAM
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS 98 SE
DIRECTX VERSION v8.0a

3D STUDIO MAX

1024x768x32

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO260
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE220

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO 3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE

COMMENT - "When it comes to 3D rendering the difference is very clear, here is a chart showing the performance of the two video cards in 3D Studio Max (OPENGL) at 1024x768x32bit, a faster lower score is obviously better. As you can clearly see the difference in performance was 40seconds, it might not sound like much but when some scenes take days to complete that 40second different will become huge. The Permedia 2 is ok for light rendering but for serious work the Permedia 3 will give much better performance."

WINTUNE 97

800x600x16

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO81
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE117

800x600x32

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO51
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE93

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO 3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE

COMMENT - "The Permedia 3 takes a commanding lead of 36mps over the Permedia 2 at 16bit and 42mps at 32bit, both cards gave good 2D quality. The result was pretty much as expected, the Permedia 3 is the more modern video card."

PC PLAYER DIRECT3D

640x480x16

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO51
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE60

640x480x32

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO48
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE59

1024x768x16

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO29
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE42

1024x768x32

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO27
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE34

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO 3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

Direct3D HAL
Gourad Shading Model
Solid Model
Textures Enabled
Fog Enabled
Dithering Enabled
Antialiasing Enabled
Bilinear Texturing Enabled
Transparent Textures Enabled
Perspective Enabled

COMMENT - "The Permedia 2 does alot better than expected at the Direct3D test, both video cards gave average performance. The Permedia 2 was never more than 13fps slower than the Permedia 3, an impressive showing by the Permedia 2."


QUAKE 2

640x480x16

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO19
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE60

640x480x32

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO16
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE51

1024x768x16

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRON/A
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE31

1024x768x32

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRON/A
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE25

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO 3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

3dnow OpenGL Driver
Demo1.dm2 benchmark
Fullscreen enabled
Texture Quality Full
8Bit Textures Disabled
Sync Every Frame Disabled

COMMENT - "I expected good frame rates from the Permedia 2 after the good result with the Direct3D test. However it didn't go so well, with Quake2 the Permedia 2 was very poor indeed. The Permedia 3 had a huge 41fps advantage over the Permdia 2, the Permdia 2 could only manage 19fps at 640x480x16bit."


QUAKE III ARENA

FASTEST

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO27
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE51

NORMAL

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO8
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE34

HIGH QUALITY

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRON/A
3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE20

DIAMOND FIRE 1000 PERMEDIA 2 PRO 3DLABS PERMEDIA 3 CREATE

COMMENT - "After the very poor showing by the Permedia 2 in Quake 2 I wasn't holding any hope for the Permedia 2 with Quake 3 Arena. If it gave such poor performance with an old game like Quake 2 then it couldn't perform better with Quake 3 could it? I was shocked to see that the score for Quake 3 at it's fastest setting was an impressive (for the Permedia 2 atleast) 27fps, it's almost playable. If your using either the Permedia 2 or 3 for games then you deserve to be shot!"

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

Default GLdriver
GL Extensions on
Fullscreen on
Demo001 Benchmark

FASTEST QUALITY

512x384 Video Mode
16Bit Colour Depth
16Bit Texture Quality
Vertex Lighting
Geometic Detail Low
Texture Detail 50%
Bilinear Texture Filtering

NORMAL QUALITY

640x480 Video Mode
16Bit Colour Depth
16Bit Texture Quality
Lightmap Lighting
Geometic Detail Medium
Texture Detail 75%
Bilinear Texture Filtering

HIGH QUALITY

800x600 Video Mode
32Bit Colour Depth
32Bit Texture Quality
Lightmap Lighting
High Geometic Detail
Full Texture Detail
Trilinear Texture Filtering

CONCLUSION - "The Permedia 3 is vastly superior to the Permedia 2 when it comes to games, neither cards were designed for games but the Permedia 3 gave playable frame rates, it's 2D quality was also very good."


LATEST REVIEWS

"Gigabyte Radeon HD 5670 review also featuring Gigabyte Radeon HD 4770. Gigabyte Radeon HD 5670 has 4% higher clock speed, 20% higher memory speed and Directx 11 Support."

"MSI Radeon HD 5670 review also featuring MSI Radeon HD 4670. MSI Radeon HD 5670 has 4% higher clock speed and 51% higher memory speed than the MSI Radeon HD 4670."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5670 review with Inno3D GeForce GT 240. Sapphire Radeon HD 5670 has 30% higher clock speed, 15% higher memory speed compared to Inno3D GeForce GT 240."

"The AMD Athlon II X2 240 Processor takes on the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800. AMD Athlon II X2 240 is a powerful 2.8Ghz Regor Socket AM2+ Processor which is compared to the Socket 939 2.4Ghz AMD Athlon64 X2 4800."

"Inno3D GeForce GT 240 review also featuring Powercolor Radeon HD 4770. Inno3D GeForce GT 240 has 27% lower clock speed, 6% faster memory speed and 544 less Shader Processors compared to the Powercolor Radeon HD 4770."

"Powercolor Radeon HD 4770 is compared to HIS Radeon HD 3870. Powercolor Radeon HD 4770 has 4% Lower Clock Speed, 30% Faster GDDR5 Memory and 320 Extra Shader Processors compared to HIS Radeon HD 3870."

"Gainward GeForce GT 240 review also featuring Asus GeForce 9600 GT. Gainward GeForce GT 240 has 27% lower clock speed, 42% higher memory speed and 32 extra Shader Processors compared to the Asus GeForce 9600 GT."

"MSI Radeon HD 5770 review also featuring Pov GeForce GTX 260. MSI Radeon HD 5770 has 33% higher clock speed, 59% higher memory speed and 584 extra Shader Processors compared to the Pov GeForce GTX 260."

"MSI Radeon HD 5970 review also features MSI GeForce GTX 295. MSI Radeon HD 5970 has 22% higher clock speed, 50% higher memory speed, 11% more memory and DirectX 11 Support compared to DirectX 10 with the MSI GeForce GTX 295."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5970 OC review also features Sapphire Radeon HD 5870. Sapphire Radeon HD 5970 OC has 14% lower clock speed, 17% lower memory speed but twice the Shader Processors."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5750 review also features Sapphire Radeon HD 5770. Sapphire Radeon HD 5750 has 18% lower clock speed, 5% lower memory speed and 10% less Shader Processors."

"Gigabyte Radeon HD 5750 review also features Gigabyte Radeon HD 4770. Gigabyte Radeon HD 5750 has 7% lower clock speed, 31% higher memory speed and 20% extra Shaders."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 review also featuring Gainward Radeon HD 4870. Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 has 11% higher clock speed and 25% higher memory speed compared to the Gainward Radeon HD 4870."

ULTIMATE HARDWARE = EMAIL - LINKS - NEWS - SITEMAP - FACEBOOK - MYSPACE - TWITTER

COPYRIGHT © 2002 - 2010 ULTIMATE HARDWARE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

SEARCH ULTIMATE HARDWARE