|
GIGABYTE RADEON 9000 REVIEW"Gigabyte Radeon 9000 review comparing the Gigabyte Radeon 9000 to the Gainward GeForce4 MX 440. Software used for testing was:- 3dmark 2001 SE, Dronez, Max Payne, Mercedes Benz Truck Racing, Quake 3, Return to Castle Wolfenstein, Serious Sam, Star Trek Voyager Elite Force, Star Wars Jedi Knight 2 - Jedi Outcast, Unreal Tournament and Unreal Tournament 2003."![]() GIGABYTE RADEON 9000 SPECIFICATIONSMAYA GV-R9000 PLUS(AF64DGE) provides high-end performance to the mainstream graphics market at a competitive price point. MAYA serial features four parallel, highly optimized rendering pipelines usually available only for the high-end gaming cards that significantly enhance performance and game-play responsiveness by doubling the pixel fill rate compared to the standard 2-pipeline architectures found in most mid-range products. Graphics controllerMemory configurationFeatures At-a-glanceComprehensive 2X and 4X AGP support High performance dual-channel 128-bit DDR Optimized for Pentium® 4 SSE2 and AMD Athlon™ 3Dnow! processor instructions Highly optimized 128-bit 2D engine with support for WindowsR XP GDI Best-of-class 3D gaming with a four-pipeline architecture Supports DirectX® 8.1 and OpenGL® 1.3 features Charisma Engine™ II supports full Transformation (T&L) Complex, realistic lighting effects with ATI SMARTSHADER™ technology Sharper-looking 3D graphics with ATI SMOOTHVISION™ technology Featuring CATALYST™ - Industry-leading software suite D-Sub and TV-Out connector supported 3D Graphics FeaturesSmartshader™ technology Full support for DirectX® 8.1 programmable pixel and vertex shaders in hardware 1.4 pixel shaders support up to 6 textures per rendering pass 1.1 vertex shaders support vertex programs up to 128 instructions Complete feature set also supported in OpenGL® via extensions Programmable shaders provide enhanced 3D effects in over 100 existing and upcoming game titles MAYA GV-R9000 PLUS FeaturesDirectX® 8.1 support OpenGL® 1.3 Smoothvision™ Hyper Z™ II Charisma Engine™ II Pixel Tapestry™ II Video Immersion™ II High Performance Memory Support Dual Display Support Integrated Transformation, Clipping and Lighting Twin Cache Architecture SuperScalar Rendering Single-Pass Multi-texturing True Color Rendering Triangle Setup Engine Texture Cache Bilinear/Trilinear Filtering Line & Edge Anti-aliasing Full-Screen Anti-aliasing Texture Compositing Texture Decompression Specular Highlights Perspectively Correct Texture Mapping Mip-Mapping Z-buffering and Double-buffering Emboss, Dot Product 3 and Environment bump mapping Spherical, Dual-Paraboloid and Cubic environment mapping Fog effects, texture lighting, video textures, reflections, shadows, spotlights etc Bundle SoftwareMotocross Mania (Game CD) 4X4 EVO and Oni (in 1 CD, Lite version)
GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION
COMMENT - "The Gigabyte Radeon 9000 wins this test simply because it was full DX8.1 features which are important for future gaming performance. It's unusual to see a budget video card with these features, the Gainward GeForce4 MX 440 is missing pixel shaders and although the Xabre by SIS has hardware pixel shaders it only has software vertex shaders. The Gainward GeForce4 MX 440 puts in a good performance when you consider it's missing pixel shaders which means it's unable to run the nature test. The Gainward GeForce4 MX 440 always performs the high polygon count tests very well so I wasn't surprised to see it beat the Gigabyte Radeon 9000."
GIGABYTE RADEON 9000 REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED |
I hope you enjoy my reviews on ati video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new ati video card that's right for your computing needs LATEST REVIEWSAMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455 ASUS RADEON HD 7970 AMD PHENOM II X4 960T SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970 AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850 AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455 INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150 AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530 INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455 INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455 CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970 AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955 AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620 AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560 AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265 AMD ATHLON II X3 455 AMD ATHLON II X3 435 AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645 AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955 CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955 CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560 INTEL CORE i3 2120 AMD ATHLON II X4 620 AMD PHENOM II X4 955 AMD PHENOM II X2 560 SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850 SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770 HIS RADEON HD 6850 PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790 AMD ATHLON II X2 265 POWERCOLOR RADEON 5770 PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550 PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560 AMD ATHLON II X4 645 AMD ATHLON II X2 255 PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970 MSI GEFORCE GTX 570 ZOTAC GEFORCE GTX 580 SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6870
|