MSI K7N2 DELTA-L vs ASROCK K7S8XE+ - THE REMATCH
"MSI K7N2 DELTA-L vs ASROCK K7S8XE+ rematch using software such as SiSoftware Sandra 2004, 3dmark 2001 SE, 3dmark 2003, Glxcess, Doom 3, Serious Sam SE, UT2004, Comanche4, Desert Rats vs Afrika Korps, Far Cry, Haegemonia, Painkiller, Unreal 2 and X2 The Threat."

"We originally reviewed the two motherboards used in this review in the MSI K7N2 Delta-L motherboard review, in that review the MSI K7N2 offered better performance than the ASROCK K7S8XE+. With the release of the 1.91a performance bios for the ASROCK K7S8XE+ motherboard we felt that a rematch was called for. We are also using dual channel for the MSI K7N2 motherboard unlike in the original review when we used single channel. The ASROCK K7S8XE+ has no support for dual channel so please bare this in mind when viewing the results. Another difference is the amount of software we have used for testing. in the original review we used a total of 9 different software titles. In this rematch we have used a total of 14 different titles both new and old to show real performance."
| NAME |
CHIPSET |
MEMORY |
FSB |
AGP |
BIOS |
SPECIAL FEATURE |
PRICE |
| MSI K7N2 DELTA-L |
NFORCE2 ULTRA 400 |
400DDR |
400FSB |
8x |
v5.8 |
DUAL CHANNEL |
$60/£43 |
| ASROCK K7S8XE+ |
SIS 748 |
400DDR |
400FSB |
8x |
v1.91A |
HYBRID BOOSTER |
$49/£27 |
| NAME |
CHIPSET |
MEMORY |
FSB |
AGP |
BIOS |
SPECIAL FEATURE |
PRICE |
GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION
SISOFTWARE SANDRA 2004
PROCESSOR - ALU DHRYSTONE
PROCESSOR - FPU WHETSTONE
MSI K7N2 DELTA-L ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.91A) ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.90)
|
COMMENT - "This is just a basic cpu test to verify that the processor is running at the same speed on the two motherboards. As you can see using the 1.91A Bios on the ASROCK K7S8XE+ the cpu is running about 2% faster than the MSI K7N2 Delta-L motherboard."
|
|
SISOFTWARE SANDRA 2004
MEMORY BANDWIDTH - INTEGER
MEMORY BANDWIDTH - FLOATING POINT
MSI K7N2 DELTA-L ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.91A) ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.90)
|
COMMENT - "The MSI K7N2 Delta-L should win this memory bandwidth test easily due to it's use of dual channel memory. The ASROCK K7S8XE+ doesn't have dual channel memory which is why it's performance is 10% lower."
|
|
SYNTHETIC BENCHMARKS
MSI K7N2 DELTA-L ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.91A) ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.90)
COMMENT - "The MSI K7N2 Delta-L puts in a great performance with 3dmark 2001 SE, it finishs 9% clear of the ASROCK K7S8XE+. However using 3dmark 2003 the MSI K7N2 Delta-L can only deliver a 4% increase over the ASROCK K7S8XE+. A big surprise was the Glexcess result because the ASROCK K7S8XE+ beat the MSI K7N2 Delta-L by 3%."
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
3DMARK 2001 SE
1024x768 Resolution
32Bit color
D3D Hardware T&L
Antialiasing Disabled
Double Frame Buffer
Compressed Texture Format
24Bit Z-Buffer Depth
3DMARK 2003
1024x768 Resolution
No Pixel Processing
Optimal Texture Filtering
4x Max Anisotropy
Optimal Vertex Shaders
No Repeat Tests
No Fixed Framerate
GLEXCESS5
1024x768 Resolution
Scene 1 Intro
Scene 2 Waver
Scene 3 Facescape
Scene 4 Exploding Logo
|
|
ADVANCED OPTIONS DISABLED
MSI K7N2 DELTA-L ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.91A) ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.90)
COMMENT - "Doom 3 was another big surprise like Glexcess, the ASROCK K7S8XE+ beat the MSI K7N2 Delta-L by 5%."
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Screen Size
Fullscreen Enabled
Vertical Sync Disabled
Demo1 Benchmark
OPTIONS DISABLED
Bump Maps Disabled
Shadows Disabled
Special Effects Disabled
Specular Disabled
Antialiasing Disabled
OPTIONS ENABLED
Bump Maps Enabled
Shadows Disabled
Special Effects Enabled
Specular Enabled
Antialiasing Disabled
|
|
SERIOUS SAM SE
MSI K7N2 DELTA-L ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.91A) ASROCK K7S8XE+ (1.90)
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
Fullscreen Enabled
Extreme Quality Settings
Large Texture Size
Optimal Texture Quality
Detail Textures Enabled
COMMENT - "The Serious Sam SE result was more of the same for the MSI K7N2 Delta-L when it beat the ASROCK K7S8XE+ by 1% to 6%."
|
|
MSI K7N2 DELTA-L vs ASROCK K7S8XE+ REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
I hope you enjoy my reviews on computer motherboards, be sure to use this information when picking out your computer motherboard that's right for your computing needs
LATEST REVIEWS
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
AMD ATHLON II X2 265
POWERCOLOR RADEON 5770
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
AMD ATHLON II X2 255
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
MSI GEFORCE GTX 570
ZOTAC GEFORCE GTX 580
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6870
|