ULTIMATE HARDWARE
HOMECPUPERFORMANCE DATABASEDIGITAL CAMERALINKSMOTHERBOARDSITEMAPVIDEO CARD

AMD SEMPRON 2800 REVIEW

"AMD Sempron 2800 review testing the AMD Sempron 2800 against the AMD Athlon XP 3200 and AMD Athlon XP 2500 processors. Software used was, 3dmark 2001 SE, 3dmark 2003, Glexcess, Sisoftware Sandra 2004, Doom3, Unreal Tournament 2004, Comanche4, Desert Rats vs Arrika Korps, Far Cry, Painkiller, Unreal 2 and X2 the Threat."
AMD SEMPRON 2800

The AMD Sempron™ processor performs at the top of its class when running the home and business applications that you need most. The AMD Sempron™ processor’s full-featured capabilities can include HyperTransport™ technology, up to 512k total high-performance cache, advanced 333Mhz front-side bus, 3DNow! Professional technology, and an integrated DDR memory controller. The AMD Sempron™ processor provides the productivity enhancing performance you need for your everyday applications. It runs over 60,000 of the world’s most popular applications, so you can enjoy solid performance. With 35 years of design and manufacturing experience and shipments of more than 240 million PC processors, you can count on AMD to provide reliable solutions for your home or business.

PROCESSOR TYPE TYPE MULTIPLIER CLOCK SPEED L1 CACHE L2 CACHE BUS SPEED PRICE
SEMPRON 2800 THOROUGHBRED B 12 2.0Ghz 128K 256K 333Mhz $110 (£76)
ATHLON XP 3200 BARTON 11 2.2Ghz 128K 512K 400Mhz $129 (£106)
ATHLON XP 2500 BARTON 11 1.8Ghz 128K 512K 333Mhz $63 (£51)
PROCESSOR TYPE TYPE MULTIPLIER CLOCK SPEED L1 CACHE L2 CACHE BUS SPEED PRICE

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

PROCESSOR AMD SEMPRON 2800
AMD ATHLON XP 3200
AMD ATHLON XP 2500
VIDEO CARD MSI GEFORCE FX 5900XT VTD128
NVIDIA DRIVER FORCEWARE v61.77
MOTHERBOARD ASROCK K7S8XE+ (v1.90 BIOS)
MEMORY 2x512MB OCZ GOLD XTC PC3200 DDR
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 2
DIRECTX VERSION v9.0c

UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004

BRIDGE OF FATE

ATHLON XP 320098
SEMPRON 280082
ATHLON XP 250085

CONVOY

ATHLON XP 320050
SEMPRON 280041
ATHLON XP 250043

TORLAN

ATHLON XP 320069
SEMPRON 280057
ATHLON XP 250059

ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 2800 ATHLON XP 2500

COMMENT - "Using the Bridge of Fate demo the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 17% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 4%. Using the Convoy demo the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 18% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 5%. Using the Torlan demo the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 18% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 4%."

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

Direct3D Render Device
1024x768 Resolution
32Bit Colour Depth
Texture Detail Normal
Character Detail Normal
World Detail High
Physics Detail High
Decal Stay High
Full Character Shadows
Full Fog Distance
Decals Enabled
Dynamic Lighting Enabled
Detail Textures Enabled
Coronas Enabled
Trilinear Filtering Enabled
Projectors Enabled
Foliage Enabled
Weather Effects Enabled

GAMES SOFTWARE

COMANCHE4

ATHLON XP 320052
SEMPRON 280042
ATHLON XP 250044

DESERT RATS vs AFRIKA KORPS

ATHLON XP 320082
SEMPRON 280067
ATHLON XP 250070

FARCRY

ATHLON XP 320045
SEMPRON 280036
ATHLON XP 250038

PAINKILLER

ATHLON XP 3200105
SEMPRON 280093
ATHLON XP 250096

UNREAL 2

ATHLON XP 320080
SEMPRON 280071
ATHLON XP 250074

X2 THE THREAT

ATHLON XP 320084
SEMPRON 280073
ATHLON XP 250074

ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 2800 ATHLON XP 2500

COMMENT - "Using Comanche4 the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 20% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 5%. Using Desert Rats vs Afrika Korps the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 19% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 5%. Using Far Cry the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 20% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 6%. Using Painkiller the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 12% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 4%. Using Unreal 2 the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 12% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 5%. Using X2 the Threat the AMD Athlon XP 3200 beats the Sempron 2800 by 14% and the Sempron 2800 loses to the Athlon XP 2500 by 2%."

CONCLUSION - "What a surprise, we expected the Athlon XP 3200 to beat the Sempron 2800 but not the slower Athlon XP 2500 as well. The extra 256k L2 cache helped the XP2500 to beat the Sempron 2800 in all of the game benchmarks tested even though it is clocked 200mhz slower."
PREVIOUS PAGE HOME
COPYRIGHT © 2002 - 2008 ULTIMATE HARDWARE ALL TRADEMARKS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEIR OWNERS!