OCUK ATI RADEON 9700 PRO REVIEW
"In this article we review the OCUK ATI RADEON 9700 PRO video card, featured software includes Half Life 2, Doom3, Quake3, Tribes Vengeance, Unreal Tournament 2004, X2 The Threat and various other popular games software."

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION
3DMARK 2003 FILLRATE
 | 1392 |
 | 1276 |
 | 2488 |
 | 2769 |
OCUK ATI RADEON 9700 PRO MSI GEFORCE 5900 XT
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
No Pixel Processing
Optimal Texture Filtering
4x Max Anisotropy
Optimal Vertex Shaders
No Repeat Tests
No Fixed Framerate
COMMENT - "This is almost the same result as in the 3dmark 2001 SE fillrate test, the OCUK ATI Radeon 9700 Pro delivers 9% extra single texturing fillrate than the MSI GeForce 5900 XT. However with multi texturing fillrate the MSI GeForce 5900 XT delivers an extra 11% multi texturing fillrate compared to the OCUK ATI Radeon 9700 Pro."
|
|
3DMARK 2003 OTHER
 | 16 |
 | 16 |
 | 45 |
 | 42 |
 | 20 |
 | 18 |
OCUK ATI RADEON 9700 PRO MSI GEFORCE 5900 XT
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
No Pixel Processing
Optimal Texture Filtering
4x Max Anisotropy
Optimal Vertex Shaders
No Repeat Tests
No Fixed Framerate
COMMENT - "The OCUK ATI Radeon 9700 Pro and the MSI GeForce 5900 XT both deliver performance which is close however the OCUK ATI Radeon 9700 Pro offers an increase in performance 0% and 10% better than the MSI GeForce 5900 XT."
|
|
3DMARK 2005 GAMES
 | 9 |
 | 4 |
 | 6 |
 | 4 |
 | 11 |
 | 6 |
OCUK ATI RADEON 9700 PRO MSI GEFORCE 5900 XT
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
No Anti-Aliasing
Optimal Filtering
HLSL VS Target 2_0
HLSL PS Target 2_0
No Fixed Framerate
COMMENT - "Going by the DX9 performance shown in 3dmark 2003 we expected the MSI GeForce 5900 XT to offer good performance with 3dmark 2005. However we were shocked to see the MSI GeForce 5900 XT perform so poorly between 34% to 56% slower than the OCUK ATI Radeon 9700 Pro."
|
|
OCUK ATI RADEON 9700 PRO REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
I hope you enjoy my reviews on ati video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new ati video card that's right for your computing needs
LATEST REVIEWS
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
|