ULTIMATE HARDWARE

GEFORCE4 TI4200 vs GEFORCE 5500

INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200 vs GALAXY ZEUS 5500

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

PROCESSOR AMD ATHLON XP 3200
VIDEO CARD GALAXY ZEUS 5500
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200
NVIDIA DRIVER FORCEWARE v61.77
MOTHERBOARD ASROCK K7S8XE+
MEMORY 2 x 512MB OCZ GOLD XTC PC3200 DDR
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 2
DIRECTX VERSION v9.0C

3DMARK 2001 SE

CAR CHASE (HIGH DETAIL)

GALAXY ZEUS 550051
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420074

DRAGOTHIC (HIGH DETAIL)

GALAXY ZEUS 550062
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420099

LOBBY (HIGH DETAIL)

GALAXY ZEUS 550061
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420082

NATURE

GALAXY ZEUS 550026
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420055

GALAXY ZEUS 5500 INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

1024x768 Resolution
32Bit color
D3D Hardware T&L
Antialiasing Disabled
Double Frame Buffer
Compressed Texture Format
24Bit Z-Buffer Depth

COMMENT - "We are now looking indepth at the high detail game benchmarks of 3dmark 2001 SE, it now becomes clear why the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 scores so highly compared to the Galaxy Zeus 5500. Firstly the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 beats the Galaxy Zeus 5500 by 32% with Car Chase, 38% with Dragothic, 26% with Lobby and finally a whopping 53% with Mother Nature."


3DMARK 2001 SE
FILLRATE

SINGLE TEXTURING

GALAXY ZEUS 5500597
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200863

MULTI TEXTURING

GALAXY ZEUS 5500314
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI42001899

GALAXY ZEUS 5500 INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

1024x768 Resolution
32Bit color
D3D Hardware T&L
Antialiasing Disabled
Double Frame Buffer
Compressed Texture Format
24Bit Z-Buffer Depth

COMMENT - "This 3dmark 2001 SE fillrate test shows shocking performance by the Galaxy Zeus 5500. Using Single Texturing the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 was 31% faster than the Galaxy Zeus 5500 and the shocking result is that the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 delivers a MASSIVE 84% performance increase over the Galaxy Zeus 5500 when using Multi-Texturing."


3DMARK 2001 SE
POLYGON COUNT

1 LIGHT

GALAXY ZEUS 550026
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420053

8 LIGHTS

GALAXY ZEUS 55004
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420010

GALAXY ZEUS 5500 INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

1024x768 Resolution
32Bit color
D3D Hardware T&L
Antialiasing Disabled
Double Frame Buffer
Compressed Texture Format
24Bit Z-Buffer Depth

COMMENT - "The great results for the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 just keep coming and this 3dmark 2001 SE polygon test is no different. The Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 delivers a 51% performance increase over the Galaxy Zeus 5500 with the 1 Light test and an even bigger 60% increase with the 8 Lights test."


3DMARK 2001 SE
BUMP MAPPING

ENVIRONMENT BUMP MAPPING

GALAXY ZEUS 550063
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200147

DOT3 BUMP MAPPING

GALAXY ZEUS 550073
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200124

GALAXY ZEUS 5500 INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

1024x768 Resolution
32Bit color
D3D Hardware T&L
Antialiasing Disabled
Double Frame Buffer
Compressed Texture Format
24Bit Z-Buffer Depth

COMMENT - "The Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 delivers 58% faster Enviroment Bump Mapping compared to the Galaxy Zeus 5500 and 42% better performance using Dot3 Bump Mapping."


3DMARK 2001 SE
SHADERS

VERTEX SHADER

GALAXY ZEUS 550057
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420078

PIXEL SHADER (SM1.1)

GALAXY ZEUS 550056
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200104

ADVANCED PIXEL SHADER (SM1.4)

GALAXY ZEUS 550030
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420083

GALAXY ZEUS 5500 INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

1024x768 Resolution
32Bit color
D3D Hardware T&L
Antialiasing Disabled
Double Frame Buffer
Compressed Texture Format
24Bit Z-Buffer Depth

COMMENT - "Apart from the 3dmark 2001 SE game benchmarks the Vertex and Pixel Shader tests are very important. Using Vertex Shaders the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 is 27% faster than the Galaxy Zeus 5500, the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 is also 47% faster using SM1.1 Shaders and 64% faster when using SM1.4 Shaders."

GEFORCE4 TI4200 VS GEFORCE 5500 REVIEW INDEX

PAGE 1 - GEFORCE4 TI4200 vs GEFORCE 5500 INTRODUCTION
PAGE 2 - 3DMARK 2001 SE
PAGE 3 - 3DMARK 2003
PAGE 4 - QUAKE III ARENA AND UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004
PAGE 5 - GAMES SOFTWARE IN MEDIUM QUALITY
PAGE 6 - GAMES SOFTWARE IN HIGH QUALITY AND FINAL RESULT

HOME = CPU - MOTHERBOARD - NEWS - 3D BENCH - SITEMAP - TECH - VIDEO CARD - BYTE NEWS - BLOG - LINKS

COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

I hope you enjoy my reviews on nvidia video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new nvidia video card that's right for your needs

LATEST REVIEWS

HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
AMD ATHLON II X2 265
POWERCOLOR RADEON 5770
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
AMD ATHLON II X2 255
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
MSI GEFORCE GTX 570
ZOTAC GEFORCE GTX 580
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6870