ULTIMATE HARDWARE

GEFORCE4 TI4200 vs GEFORCE 5500

INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200 vs GALAXY ZEUS 5500

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

PROCESSOR AMD ATHLON XP 3200
VIDEO CARD GALAXY ZEUS 5500
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200
NVIDIA DRIVER FORCEWARE v61.77
MOTHERBOARD ASROCK K7S8XE+
MEMORY 2 x 512MB OCZ GOLD XTC PC3200 DDR
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 2
DIRECTX VERSION v9.0C

GAMES SOFTWARE

HIGH QUALITY

DOOM 3

GALAXY ZEUS 550022
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420029

FARCRY

GALAXY ZEUS 550030
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420043

SCRAPLAND

GALAXY ZEUS 550015
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420041

TRIBES VENGEANCE

GALAXY ZEUS 550019
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420026

WARHAMMER 40K - DAWN OF WAR

GALAXY ZEUS 550030
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420040

XPAND RALLY

GALAXY ZEUS 550012
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI420029

GALAXY ZEUS 5500 INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200

COMMENT - "We are now running the games at high quality settings at the 1024x768 resolution, as you can see both video cards have taken quite a performance hit. The Galaxy Zeus 5500 is now unplayable with Doom3 but the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 is still atleast playable at 29fps. Far Cry is still playable on both video cards but the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 is 31% faster than the Galaxy Zeus 5500. I am not sure what happened to the performance of the Galaxy Zeus 5500 with Scrapland but high quality settings killed it's performance, the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 is now 64% faster than the Galaxy Zeus 5500. Both video cards are now unplayable with Tribes Vengeance with the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 27% faster than the Galaxy Zeus 5500. Warhammer 40K Dawn of War is another win for the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200 and it outperforms the Galaxy Zeus 5500 by 25%. The Galaxy Zeus 5500 was unplayable with Xpand Rally and the Inno3D GeForce Ti4200 is 59% faster."

FINAL RESULT

GALAXY ZEUS 5500720
INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI42001120

GALAXY ZEUS 5500 INNO3D GEFORCE4 TI4200

COMMENT - "I think the results to the left are pretty clear, although the Galaxy Zeus 5500 is the more modern video card using the GeForce GPU and supporting the latest DX9 features it's performance was 37% LESS than the Inno3D GeForce4 Ti4200."

GEFORCE4 TI4200 VS GEFORCE 5500 REVIEW INDEX

PAGE 1 - GEFORCE4 TI4200 vs GEFORCE 5500 INTRODUCTION
PAGE 2 - 3DMARK 2001 SE
PAGE 3 - 3DMARK 2003
PAGE 4 - QUAKE III ARENA AND UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004
PAGE 5 - GAMES SOFTWARE IN MEDIUM QUALITY
PAGE 6 - GAMES SOFTWARE IN HIGH QUALITY AND FINAL RESULT

HOME = CPU - MOTHERBOARD - NEWS - 3D BENCH - SITEMAP - TECH - VIDEO CARD - BYTE NEWS - BLOG - LINKS

COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

I hope you enjoy my reviews on nvidia video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new nvidia video card that's right for your needs

LATEST REVIEWS

NVIDIA KEPLER INFORMATION
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970