AMD SEMPRON 2200 REVIEW
"In this article we test the AMD Sempron 2200 cpu against the Sempron 3100, Athlon XP 3200 and XP 2500 using the GIGABYTE K8NS PRO and ASROCK K7S8XE+ motherboards. The following software was used during testing, 3dmark 2003, 3dmark 2005, SiSoftware Sandra 2005, CPU Bench 2003, Metabench, KribiBench, Realstorm 2004, Sciencemark 2, Nvidia Dawn, Doom 3, Half Life 2, Quake 3 Arena, Scrapland, Serious Sam SE, Tribes Vengeance, Unreal Tournament 2004, Warhammer 40,000 Dawn of War, X2 the Threat and Xpand Rally."
GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION
SISOFTWARE SANDRA 2005
PROCESSOR - ALU DHRYSTONE
PROCESSOR - FPU WHETSTONE
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
|
COMMENT - "Using SiSoftware Sandra 2005 CPU the Sempron 2200 was 32% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 26% slower than the Sempron 3100 and 18% slower than the Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
SISOFTWARE SANDRA 2005
MULTI-MEDIA - INTEGER
MULTI-MEDIA - FLOATING POINT
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
|
COMMENT - "Using SiSoftware Sandra 2005 Multi-Media the Sempron 2200 was 33% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 20% slower than Sempron 3100 and 19% slower than Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
SISOFTWARE SANDRA 2005
MEMORY BANDWIDTH - INTEGER
MEMORY BANDWIDTH - FLOATING POINT
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
|
COMMENT - "Using the SiSoftware Sandra 2005 Memory test the Sempron 2200 was 17% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 18% slower than Sempron 3100 and 4% slower than Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
|
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
|
COMMENT - "Using CPU Bench 2003 the Sempron 2200 was 28% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 29% slower than Sempron 3100 and 15% slower than Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
|
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
|
COMMENT - "Using Metabench the Sempron 2200 was 31% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 24% slower than Sempron 3100 and 18% slower than Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
|
COMMENT - "Using Kribibench Jet Shadow test the Sempron 2200 was 41% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 32% slower than Sempron 3100 and 29% slower than Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
NVIDIA DAWN BENCHMARK
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
|
COMMENT - "Using Nvidia Dawn for benchmarking the Sempron 2200 was 10% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 29% slower than Sempron 3100 and 4% slower than Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
AMD SEMPRON 2200 REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
I hope you enjoy my reviews on amd processors, be sure to use this information when picking out a new amd processor that's right for your computing needs
LATEST REVIEWS
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
|