AMD SEMPRON 2200 REVIEW "In this article we test the AMD Sempron 2200 cpu against the Sempron 3100, Athlon XP 3200 and XP 2500 using the GIGABYTE K8NS PRO and ASROCK K7S8XE+ motherboards. The following software was used during testing, 3dmark 2003, 3dmark 2005, SiSoftware Sandra 2005, CPU Bench 2003, Metabench, KribiBench, Realstorm 2004, Sciencemark 2, Nvidia Dawn, Doom 3, Half Life 2, Quake 3 Arena, Scrapland, Serious Sam SE, Tribes Vengeance, Unreal Tournament 2004, Warhammer 40,000 Dawn of War, X2 the Threat and Xpand Rally."
GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION
QUAKE III ARENA
HIGH QUALITY ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
COMMENT - "Using Quake 3 as benchmark the high quality will show cpu performance, ultra high quality will show a mixture and extreme quality will be video limited. The Sempron 2200 was 24% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 29% slower than Sempron 3100 and 14% slower than Athlon XP 2500." |
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Default GLdriver
GL Extensions on
1024x768 Video Mode
32Bit Colour Depth
Fullscreen on
Lightmap Lighting
32Bit Texture Quality
Demo four.dm_66
HIGH QUALITY
Medium Geometic Detail
75% Texture Detail
Trilinear Texture Filtering
ULTRA HIGH QUALITY
High Geometic Detail
Full Texture Detail
Trilinear Texture Filtering
EXTREME QUALITY
High Geometic Detail
Full Texture Detail
8x Anisotropic Filtering
4x Anti-Aliasing
|
|
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
COMMENT - "Using Scrapland as benchmark the low quality setting will show cpu performance, medium quality will show a mixture and high quality will be video limited. The Sempron 2200 was 32% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 43% slower than Sempron 3100 and 21% slower than Athlon XP 2500." |
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Video Mode
Vsync Disabled
Crazy Gambler Level
LOW QUALITY
Bilinear Texture Filtering
Low Texture Detail
Shadows Disabled
Fog Disabled
Bloom Disabled
Motion Blur Disabled
Deformation Disabled
MEDIUM QUALITY
Trilinear Texture Filtering
Medium Texture Detail
Shadows Disabled
Fog Enabled
Bloom Enabled
Motion Blur Enabled
Deformation Enabled
HIGH QUALITY
8x Anisotropic Filtering
High Texture Detail
Low Shadows Enabled
Fog Enabled
Bloom Enabled
Motion Blur Enabled
Deformation Enabled
|
|
ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200 |
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
Fullscreen Enabled
Extreme Quality Settings
Large Texture Size
Optimal Texture Quality
Detail Textures Enabled
COMMENT - "Using Serious Sam SE for the Grand Cathedral is the most cpu limiting demo tested. The Sempron 2200 was 30% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 34% slower than Sempron 3100 and 20% slower than Athlon XP 2500."
|
|
TRIBES VENGEANCE
LOW QUALITY ATHLON XP 3200 SEMPRON 3100 ATHLON XP 2500 SEMPRON 2200
COMMENT - "Using Tribes Vengeance for benchmarking low quality will show cpu performance, medium quality will show a mixture and high quality will be video limited. The Sempron 2200 was 29% slower than the Athlon XP 3200, 38% slower than Sempron 3100 and 17% slower than Athlon XP 2500." |
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
Imperial Arena level
LOW QUALITY
Bump Map Detail Low
Texture Detail Low
Terrain Micro Disabled
Fluid Surface Detail Low
Fogging Distance Low
Dynamic Shadow Low
Glow Detail Low
Terrain Deco Disabled
World Detail Low
v2.0 Pixel Shaders Disabled
MEDIUM QUALITY
Bump Map Detail Low
Texture Detail Medium
Terrain Micro Enabled
Fluid Surface Detail Medium
Fogging Distance Medium
Dynamic Shadow Medium
Glow Detail Medium
Terrain Deco Disabled
World Detail Medium
V2.0 Pixel Shaders Disabled
HIGH QUALITY
Bump Map Detail High
Texture Detail High
Terrain Micro Enabled
Fluid Surface Detail UHigh
Fogging Distance High
Dynamic Shadow High
Glow Detail High
Terrain Deco Enabled
World Detail High
V2.0 Pixel Shaders Disabled
|
|
AMD SEMPRON 2200 REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED |
I hope you enjoy my reviews on amd processors, be sure to use this information when picking out a new amd processor that's right for your computing needs LATEST REVIEWS
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
|
