AMD ATHLON64 3400 REVIEW
"AMD Athlon64 3400 review testing the powerful 2.4Ghz Newcastle Socket 754 processor from AMD. Other hardware used was the AMD Sempron 3100, AMD Athlon XP 3200 and the GIGABYTE K8NS PRO motherboard."

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION
1944 - BATTLE OF THE BULGE
 | 158 |
 | 133 |
 | 157 |
 | 131 |
 | 130 |
 | 125 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
St. Vith Scenario
LOW QUALITY
Texture Detail Low
Particle Density Low
Shadow Resolution Low
Water Disabled
Decals Disabled
Fog Enabled
Wire Physics Disabled
Grass Disabled
COMMENT - "This is the start of the game benchmarks which are for most people the most important, I have selected low quality settings because we are benchmarking the processor and not the video card. As expected the Athlon64 3400 is the clear winner outperforming the Sempron 3100 by 4% to 16%."
|
|
AREA 51
 | 78 |
 | 66 |
 | 53 |
 | 53 |
 | 39 |
 | 39 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Lies Of The Past Level
High Detail Disabled
COMMENT - "Area 51 quickly becomes video card limited and the only difference is at 1024x768 when the Athlon64 3400 outperformed the Sempron 3100 by 16%."
|
|
AURORA WATCHING
 | 88 |
 | 69 |
 | 88 |
 | 64 |
 | 86 |
 | 57 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
"The Worst Hangover Ever" Level
LOW QUALITY
Quality Shadows Disabled
Texture Resolution 25%
Pixel Shaders Disabled
Fullscreen Effects Disabled
Decal Textures Disabled
High Particle Count Enabled
COMMENT - "Aurora Watching is another new game like Area 51 but this time the game is much more cpu limited rather than video card limited. The Athlon64 3400 outperforms the Sempron 3100 by between 22% to 34%."
|
|
CODENAME PANZERS PHASE TWO
 | 70 |
 | 51 |
 | 62 |
 | 47 |
 | 62 |
 | 47 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
"Tunis" Level
32bit Color Depth
Default Refresh Rate
Vsync Disabled
LOW QUALITY
Anti-Aliasing Disabled
Shadows Disabled
Texture Detail Low
Bilinear
COMMENT - "Codename Panzers Phase Two is a strategy game and this type of game usually makes good use of a strong processor, this is correct with this game and the Athlon64 3400 outperforms the Sempron 3100 by 25% to 28%."
|
|
COMANCHE 4
 | 73 |
 | 55 |
 | 72 |
 | 55 |
 | 69 |
 | 55 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Fullscreen Enabled
32Bit Colour Depth
Anti-Aliasing Disabled
Terrain Detail High
Object Detail High
Texture Quality High
Water Quality High
Shadows High
Particle Density High
COMMENT - "Just like strategy games simulation games also make good use of a fast processor and the Athlon64 3400 outperforms the Sempron 3100 by 21% to 25%."
|
|
DELTA FORCE EXTREME
 | 62 |
 | 51 |
 | 55 |
 | 51 |
 | 43 |
 | 43 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Peru Campaign
Mission Flood
LOW QUALITY
Terrain Polygon Low
Terrain Texture Normal
Object Polygon Detail Low
Object Texture Detail Normal
Water Quality Low
Shadows Low
Particle Density Low
Frame Effects Minimal
Antialiasing Disabled
Bilinear
Texture Compression Maximum
COMMENT - "Delta Force Extreme is quite a graphically demanding game and quickly becomes video card limited at higher resolutions. However the Athlon64 3400 still outperformed the Sempron 3100 by 18% at the lowest resolution."
|
|
 | 113 |
 | 94 |
 | 86 |
 | 79 |
 | 63 |
 | 62 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
High Quality
Fullscreen Enabled
Vertical Sync Disabled
Demo1 Benchmark
LOW QUALITY
Bump Maps Disabled
Shadows Disabled
Special Effects Disabled
Specular Disabled
Antialiasing Disabled
COMMENT - "Doom 3 is another graphically demanding game but the Athlon64 3400 outperformed the Sempron 3100 by 9% to 17%."
|
|
AMD ATHLON64 3400 REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
I hope you enjoy my reviews on amd processors, be sure to use this information when picking out a new amd processor that's right for your computing needs
LATEST REVIEWS
NVIDIA KEPLER INFORMATION
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
|