|
|
AMD ATHLON64 3400 REVIEW
"AMD Athlon64 3400 review testing the powerful 2.4Ghz Newcastle Socket 754 processor from AMD. Other hardware used was the AMD Sempron 3100, AMD Athlon XP 3200 and the GIGABYTE K8NS PRO motherboard."

In this review we are testing the AMD Athlon64 3400, this is a very powerful 2.4Ghz Socket 754 processor from AMD. There are two versions of the Athlon64 3400, the first is the older Clawhammer which has a clock speed of 2.2Ghz and a huge 1024K Level 2 cache. The version we are testing here is the later Newcastle version of the Athlon64 3400 which has a clock speed of 2.4Ghz (200Mhz higher than the older Clawhammer) and a 512K Level 2 Cache.
We will be comparing the Athlon64 3400 to the budget Sempron 3100 because we know alot of you are wondering how the Sempron 3100 measures up against the more expensive Athlon64. In some of the synthetic benchmarks we will also be featuring the well known Athlon XP 3200 although it isn't being featured in any of the game benchmarks.
We will be testing the Athlon64 3400 and Sempron 3100 processors using a very wide range of synthetic and game benchmarks. The synthetic benchmarks used duing this review was 3dmark 2001 SE, 3dmark 2003, 3dmark 2005, CPU Bench 2003, KribiBench, Metabench, Realstorm 2004, SiSoftware Sandra 2005, Sciencemark 2 and SuperPI.
We also used an even bigger range of old and new games software for benchmarking, we used 1944 Battle of the Bulge, Area 51, Aurora Watching, Codename Panzers Phase 2, Comanche4, Delta Force Extreme, Doom 3, Far Cry, Lego Starwars, Pariah, Quake 3 Arena, Scar, Scrapland, Trackmania Sunrise, Tribes Vengeance, Unreal Tournament, Unreal Tournament 2004, Warhammer 40K Dawn of War and Xpand Rally for a very comprehensive range of software.
GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION
THE RESULTS WHICH WILL SHOW CPU PERFORMANCE ARE THE LOW RESOLUTION 1024x768 RESULTS!
1944 - BATTLE OF THE BULGE
 | 158 |
 | 133 |
 | 157 |
 | 131 |
 | 130 |
 | 125 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
St. Vith Scenario
LOW QUALITY
Texture Detail Low
Particle Density Low
Shadow Resolution Low
Water Disabled
Decals Disabled
Fog Enabled
Wire Physics Disabled
Grass Disabled
COMMENT - "This is the start of the game benchmarks which are for most people the most important, I have selected low quality settings because we are benchmarking the processor and not the video card. As expected the Athlon64 3400 is the clear winner outperforming the Sempron 3100 by 4% to 16%."
|
|
AREA 51
 | 78 |
 | 66 |
 | 53 |
 | 53 |
 | 39 |
 | 39 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Lies Of The Past Level
High Detail Disabled
COMMENT - "Area 51 quickly becomes video card limited and the only difference is at 1024x768 when the Athlon64 3400 outperformed the Sempron 3100 by 16%."
|
|
AURORA WATCHING
 | 88 |
 | 69 |
 | 88 |
 | 64 |
 | 86 |
 | 57 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
"The Worst Hangover Ever" Level
LOW QUALITY
Quality Shadows Disabled
Texture Resolution 25%
Pixel Shaders Disabled
Fullscreen Effects Disabled
Decal Textures Disabled
High Particle Count Enabled
COMMENT - "Aurora Watching is another new game like Area 51 but this time the game is much more cpu limited rather than video card limited. The Athlon64 3400 outperforms the Sempron 3100 by between 22% to 34%."
|
|
CODENAME PANZERS PHASE TWO
 | 70 |
 | 51 |
 | 62 |
 | 47 |
 | 62 |
 | 47 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
"Tunis" Level
32bit Color Depth
Default Refresh Rate
Vsync Disabled
LOW QUALITY
Anti-Aliasing Disabled
Shadows Disabled
Texture Detail Low
Bilinear
COMMENT - "Codename Panzers Phase Two is a strategy game and this type of game usually makes good use of a strong processor, this is correct with this game and the Athlon64 3400 outperforms the Sempron 3100 by 25% to 28%."
|
|
COMANCHE 4
 | 73 |
 | 55 |
 | 72 |
 | 55 |
 | 69 |
 | 55 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Fullscreen Enabled
32Bit Colour Depth
Anti-Aliasing Disabled
Terrain Detail High
Object Detail High
Texture Quality High
Water Quality High
Shadows High
Particle Density High
COMMENT - "Just like strategy games simulation games also make good use of a fast processor and the Athlon64 3400 outperforms the Sempron 3100 by 21% to 25%."
|
|
DELTA FORCE EXTREME
 | 62 |
 | 51 |
 | 55 |
 | 51 |
 | 43 |
 | 43 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
Peru Campaign
Mission Flood
LOW QUALITY
Terrain Polygon Low
Terrain Texture Normal
Object Polygon Detail Low
Object Texture Detail Normal
Water Quality Low
Shadows Low
Particle Density Low
Frame Effects Minimal
Antialiasing Disabled
Bilinear
Texture Compression Maximum
COMMENT - "Delta Force Extreme is quite a graphically demanding game and quickly becomes video card limited at higher resolutions. However the Athlon64 3400 still outperformed the Sempron 3100 by 18% at the lowest resolution."
|
|
DOOM III
 | 113 |
 | 94 |
 | 86 |
 | 79 |
 | 63 |
 | 62 |
ATHLON64 3400 SEMPRON 3100
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
High Quality
Fullscreen Enabled
Vertical Sync Disabled
Demo1 Benchmark
LOW QUALITY
Bump Maps Disabled
Shadows Disabled
Special Effects Disabled
Specular Disabled
Antialiasing Disabled
COMMENT - "Doom 3 is another graphically demanding game but the Athlon64 3400 outperformed the Sempron 3100 by 9% to 17%."
|
|
|