ULTIMATE HARDWARE

GEFORCE4 TI4200 PERFORMANCE

"In this article we test the Nvidia GeForce4 Ti4200 using Delta Force Extreme, Earth 2160 and Far Cry."
NVIDIA GEFORCE4 TI

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

PROCESSOR AMD ATHLON64 3000
VIDEO CARD NVIDIA GEFORCE4 TI4200
NVIDIA DRIVER FORCEWARE v81.98
MOTHERBOARD ASROCK 939 DUAL SATA 2
MEMORY 2 x 512MB OCZ GOLD XTC PC3200 DDR
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 2
DIRECTX VERSION v9.0C

DELTA FORCE EXTREME

LOW QUALITY

800x60033
1024x76827
1280x102421
1600x120016

MEDIUM QUALITY

800x60030
1024x76824
1280x102418
1600x120013

HIGH QUALITY

800x60020
1024x76814
1280x10248
1600x12005

800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200

COMMENT - "Delta Force Extreme is another very demanding shader intensive game which isn't ideally suited to the GeForce4 Ti4200 because all quality settings use some form of shadows. The GeForce4 Ti4200 is only really playable at 800x600 using low and medium quality settings and is unplayable using high quality."

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

Peru Campaign
Mission Flood

LOW QUALITY

Terrain Polygon Low
Terrain Texture Normal
Object Polygon Detail Low
Object Texture Detail Normal
Water Quality Low
Shadows Low
Antialiasing Disabled
Bilinear

MEDIUM QUALITY

Terrain Polygon Normal
Terrain Texture High
Object Polygon Detail Normal
Object Texture Detail High
Water Quality Normal
Shadows Normal
Antialiasing Disabled
Trilinear

HIGH QUALITY

Terrain Polygon High
Terrain Texture Highest
Object Polygon Detail High
Object Texture Detail Highest
Water Quality High
Shadows High
Antialiasing 4x
Anisotropic

EARTH 2160

LOW QUALITY42
MEDIUM QUALITY20
HIGH QUALITY11

LOW QUALITY MEDIUM QUALITY HIGH QUALITY

COMMENT - "Earth 2160 is a very recent space strategy game, the GeForce4 Ti4200 is only playable using low quality which uses the resolution of 800x600."

FAR CRY

LOW QUALITY

800x600138
1024x768122
1280x102488
1600x120058

MEDIUM QUALITY

800x60070
1024x76848
1280x102433
1600x120022

HIGH QUALITY

800x60049
1024x76833
1280x102422
1600x120015

800x600 1024x768 1280x1024 1600x1200

COMMENT - "The GeForce4 Ti4200 delivers very playable performance using low quality at all of the resolutions tested. Medium Quality does look much better than low quality and the GeForce4 Ti4200 is playable upto 1024x768. When using high quality settings the GeForce4 Ti4200 was only really playable at 800x600."

BENCHMARK SETTINGS

LOW QUALITY

Texture Quality Low
Bilinear
Anisotropic Filtering 1
Particle Count Low
Special Effects Low
Enviroment Quality Low
Shadow Quality Low
Water Quality Low
Lighting Quality Low

MEDIUM QUALITY

Texture Quality Medium
Trilinear
Anisotropic Filtering 2
Particle Count Medium
Special Effects Medium
Enviroment Quality Medium
Shadow Quality Medium
Water Quality Medium
Lighting Quality Medium

HIGH QUALITY

Texture Quality High
Trilinear
Anisotropic Filtering 4
Particle Count High
Special Effects High
Enviroment Quality High
Shadow Quality High
Water Quality High
Lighting Quality High

GEFORCE4 TI4200 REVIEW INDEX

PAGE 1 - GEFORCE4 TI4200 INTRODUCTION
PAGE 2 - CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK, COMANCHE4 AND CODENAME PANZERS
PAGE 3 - DELTA FORCE EXTREME, EARTH 2160 AND FAR CRY
PAGE 4 - GT LEGENDS, KING KONG AND LEGO STAR WARS
PAGE 5 - SCOOTER WAR3Z, QUAKE 4 AND SCRAPLAND
PAGE 6 - SERIOUS SAM 2 AND TRACKMANIA SUNRISE
PAGE 7 - TRIBES VENGEANCE AND UNREAL TOURNAMENT 2004
PAGE 8 - DAWN OF WAR AND WORLD RACING 2
PAGE 9 - 1944 BATTLE OF THE BULGE AND XPAND RALLY

HOME = CPU - MOTHERBOARD - NEWS - 3D BENCH - SITEMAP - TECH - VIDEO CARD - BYTE NEWS - BLOG - LINKS

COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

I hope you enjoy my reviews on nvidia video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new nvidia video card that's right for your needs

LATEST REVIEWS

NVIDIA KEPLER INFORMATION
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970