GIGABYTE GEFORCE PCX 5900 REVIEW
"Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 review featuring Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT and Gainward GeForce4 Ti4600. The Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 is powered by the Nvidia GeForce PCX 5900 GPU. Software used:- 3dmark 2001 SE, 3dmark 2003, 3dmark 2005, 3dmark 2006, PowerVR Fablemark, PowerVR Templemark, PowerVR Villagemark and Rightmark."

The Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 is powered by Nvidia GeForce PCX 5900 GPU using the new PCI-Express interface. The Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 is a DirectX 9.0 video card with 128MB DDR memory using a fast 256bit memory interface. The Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 has full support for the Gigabyte V-Tuner 2 overclocking applications. The Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 has DVI-I, TV Output and D-Sub connectors, it is also supplied with PowerDVD 5.0 and two world class games.
GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION |
|
3DMARK BENCHMARKS
 | 862 |
 | 2047 |
 | 148 |
 | 445 |
GIGABYTE PCX 5900 SAPPHIRE 9600 XT GAINWARD GF4 Ti4600
COMMENT - "The results start off fairly close with the Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT only 4% faster than the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 with the Gainward GeForce4 Ti4600 further behind by 10%. 3dmark 2003 is also a close result between the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 and Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT, this time the difference is 5% in favour of the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900. The Gainward GeForce4 Ti4600 is a DX8 video card and can't run the high scoring mother nature test. 3dmark 2005 is a DX9 only benchmark which is why there are no results for the Gainward GeForce4 Ti4600. It appears that the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 is pretty weak when running DX9 software and the Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT storms ahead and beats the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 by 58%. Things don't improve with 3dmark 2006 and the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 loses to the Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT by a massive 67%."
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
3DMARK 2001 SE
1024x768 Resolution
D3D Hardware T&L
Antialiasing Disabled
Compressed Texture Format
24Bit Z-Buffer Depth
3DMARK 2003
1024x768 Resolution
No Pixel Processing
Optimal Texture Filtering
4x Max Anisotropy
Optimal Vertex Shaders
3DMARK 2005
1024x768 Resolution
No Anti-Aliasing
Optimal Filtering
HLSL VS Target 2_0
HLSL PS Target 2_0
3DMARK 2006
1280x1024 Resolution
Antialiasing Disabled
Optimal Filtering
|
|
POWERVR BENCHMARK
GIGABYTE PCX 5900 SAPPHIRE 9600 XT GAINWARD GF4 Ti4600
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
Vsync Disabled
COMMENT - "Things are much more positive with these PowerVR benchmarks and the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 beats the Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT by 32%. Fablemark uses alot of shadows and the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 has Ultra Shadow technology which improves it's performance with shadow intensive applications. The Templemark result is so close that I am considering it a draw between the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 and Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT. Villagemark favours the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 and it beats the Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT by 19%."
|
|
RIGHTMARK
 | 47 |
 | 160 |
GIGABYTE PCX 5900 SAPPHIRE 9600 XT GAINWARD GF4 Ti4600
|
BENCHMARK SETTINGS
1024x768 Resolution
32Bit colour Depth
COMMENT - "The Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT outperforms the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 by 4% with the PS1.1 benchmark. As shown with 3dmark 2005 and 3dmark 2006 the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 is poor with DX9 which is why the Gigabyte GeForce PCX 5900 loses to the Sapphire Radeon 9600 XT by 71% in the PS2.0 test."
|
|
GIGABYTE GEFORCE PCX 5900 REVIEW REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
I hope you enjoy my reviews on nvidia video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new nvidia video card that's right for your needs
LATEST REVIEWS
NVIDIA KEPLER INFORMATION
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
|