"Today we are reviewing the powerful AMD Athlon64 3500 Venice processor for Socket 939 which runs at 2.2Ghz, other processors featured include the Athlon64 3400 Newcastle 2.4Ghz Socket 754, Athlon64 3000 Venice 1.8Ghz Socket 939 and the Sempron 3400 Palermo 2.0Ghz Socket 754 processors. Benchmark software used was 3dmark 2005 and CPU Bench 2003."
AMD ATHLON64 3500 VENICE REVIEW

GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION |
|
3DMARK 2005 CPU SCORE
ATHLON64 3500 VENICE ATHLON64 3400 NEWCASTLE ATHLON64 3000 VENICE SEMPRON 3400 PALERMO
COMMENT - "The integrated DDR memory controller gives the Socket 939 Athlon64 processors the edge because the Athlon64 3000 is only 2% behind the 600Mhz faster Athlon64 3400."
|
COMMENT - "The Athlon64 3500 takes an early lead beating the Athlon64 3400 by 9% which is especially impressive when you consider that the Athlon64 3400 has a 200Mhz speed advantage over the Athlon64 3500."
|
|
CPU BENCH 2003
ATHLON64 3500 VENICE ATHLON64 3400 NEWCASTLE ATHLON64 3000 VENICE SEMPRON 3400 PALERMO
|
COMMENT - "Once again the Athlon64 3500 has the edge beating the Athlon64 3400 by 5%, the Athlon64 3000 by 19% and the Sempron by 20%."
|
|
CPU BENCH 2003
ATHLON64 3500 VENICE ATHLON64 3400 NEWCASTLE ATHLON64 3000 VENICE SEMPRON 3400 PALERMO
|
COMMENT - "It's a mixed result for the Athlon64 3500 and although it beats the Athlon64 3400 by 6% with the CPU ALU test the Athlon64 3500 loses the CPU FPU test to the Athlon64 3400 by 10%. It appears that the integrated DDR memory controller is of little use with the CPU FPU test."
|
|
CPU BENCH 2003
ATHLON64 3500 VENICE ATHLON64 3400 NEWCASTLE ATHLON64 3000 VENICE SEMPRON 3400 PALERMO
|
COMMENT - "It appears that the FPU Single and Double Precision tests favour a high clockspeed because the Athlon64 3400 beats the Athlon64 3500 by 9% to 10%. Even the Sempron 3400 with it's lower 256K L2 Cache but higher clockspeed is able to beat the Athlon64 3000 by 10% to 11%."
|
|
CPU BENCH 2003
ATHLON64 3500 VENICE ATHLON64 3400 NEWCASTLE ATHLON64 3000 VENICE SEMPRON 3400 PALERMO
|
COMMENT - "This memory bandwidth benchmark favours the DDR memory controller found on the Socket 939 Athlon64 processors and the Athlon64 3500 beats the Athlon64 3400 by between 28% to 29%. As further proof of the power of the DDR memory controller even the Athlon64 3000 beats the Athlon64 3400 by 12%."
|
|
CPU BENCH 2003
ATHLON64 3500 VENICE ATHLON64 3400 NEWCASTLE ATHLON64 3000 VENICE SEMPRON 3400 PALERMO
|
COMMENT - "Raw speed is again the order of the day and the Athlon64 3400 beats the Athlon64 3500 by between 7% to 9%. The Sempron 3400 is also able to beat the Athlon64 3000 thanks to it's 200Mhz higher clock speed."
|
|
AMD ATHLON64 3500 VENICE REVIEW INDEX
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
|
I hope you enjoy my reviews on amd processors, be sure to use this information when picking out a new amd processor that's right for your computing needs
LATEST REVIEWS
NVIDIA KEPLER INFORMATION
AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
|