ULTIMATE HARDWARE

DIGITAL CAMERA REVIEWSEMAILLINKSMOTHERBOARD REVIEWSPERFORMANCE DATABASEPROCESSOR REVIEWSSITEMAPULTIMATE HARDWAREVIDEO CARD REVIEWS

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO REVIEW

"Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO review also featuring the Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO and Sapphire Radeon x1650 Pro. The Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO is equipped with 12 Pixel Shader Processors, 8 Vertex Shader Processors, a 256-bit memory interface and driven by the x1800 GTO core."

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO


GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

VIDEO CARD SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO
ATI DRIVER ATI CATALYST v6.8
PROCESSOR AMD ATHLON64 3500
MOTHERBOARD ASROCK 939 DUAL SATA 2
MEMORY 2 x 512MB OCZ GOLD XTC PC3200 DDR
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 2
DIRECTX VERSION v9.0C

BENCHMARK SETTINGS:- We use two different image quality and resolution settings when we benchmark computer hardware for review. Medium quality setting uses a resolution of 1280x1024 (unless otherwise stated) and all of the game settings are set to medium, this setting will test both the processor and video performance. High quality setting uses a resolution of 1600x1200 (unless otherwise stated) and all of the game settings are set to high, this setting is a very demanding test for video rather processor performance!

3DMARK 2006

3DMARK SCORE

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO2819
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO 1569
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO2246

SM2.0 SCORE

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO1201
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO 708
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO903

SM3.0 SCORE

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO1187
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO N/A
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO906

SAPPHIRE X1800 GTO SAPPHIRE X800 GTO SAPPHIRE X1650 PRO

COMMENT - "3dmark 2006 uses all of the latest 3D technology such as Shader Model 3.0 and HDR. Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO performs well beating Sapphire Radeon x1650 Pro by 21% and the Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO by 45%. Due to the older technology found on the Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO it doesn't support SM3.0."

3DMARK 2006 GAMES

RETURN TO PROXYCON (SM2.0)

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO9.11
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO 5.67
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO7.04

FIREFLY FOREST (SM2.0)

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO10.9
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO 7.64
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO7.99

CANYON FLIGHT (HDR SM3.0)

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO11.7
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO N/A
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO8.26

DEEP FREEZE (HDR SM3.0)

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO12.03
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO N/A
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO9.85

SAPPHIRE X1800 GTO SAPPHIRE X800 GTO SAPPHIRE X1650 PRO

COMMENT - "The Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO makes light work of these demanding 3dmark 2006 game benchmarks beating the Sapphire Radeon x1650 Pro by between 19% to 30%. The Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO performs fairly well when using the SM2.0 game benchmarks but is unable to run the SM3.0 benchmarks."

3DMARK 2006 FILLRATE

SINGLE TEXTURING

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO3169
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO 2683
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO2082

MULTI TEXTURING

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO5982
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO 5678
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO2343

SAPPHIRE X1800 GTO SAPPHIRE X800 GTO SAPPHIRE X1650 PRO

COMMENT - "The Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO and Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO both have a 256Bit Memory Interface so they easily beat the Sapphire Radeon x1650 Pro which only has a 128Bit Memory Interface."

POWERVR FABLEMARK

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO161
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO 127
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1650 PRO76

SAPPHIRE X1800 GTO SAPPHIRE X800 GTO SAPPHIRE X1650 PRO

COMMENT - "Fablemark is the most advanced benchmark created by PowerVR and the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO beats the Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO by 22% and the Sapphire Radeon x1650 Pro by a massive 53%."
PREVIOUS NEXT PAGE

DIGITAL CAMERA REVIEWSEMAILLINKSMOTHERBOARD REVIEWSPERFORMANCE DATABASEPROCESSOR REVIEWSSITEMAPULTIMATE HARDWAREVIDEO CARD REVIEWS

COPYRIGHT © 2002 - 2008 ULTIMATE HARDWARE ALL TRADEMARKS ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEIR OWNERS!