ULTIMATE HARDWARE

ULTIMATE HARDWARE = CPU REVIEWS, MOTHERBOARD REVIEWS, PERFORMANCE DATABASE AND VIDEO CARD REVIEWS

2THEMAX 3DFX BANSHEE REVIEW

"Today we review the 2theMAX 3DFX Banshee with 16MB Memory against the Diamond S3 Savage4 Pro and the Hercules Beast S3 Savage3D using a powerful AMD Duron 750MHZ Processor."

2THEMAX 3DFX BANSHEE

"3dfx released the Voodoo Banshee at a lower price to aim at the mainstream market. A single-chip solution the Banshee was offered excellent 2D and 3D performance with some draw backs compared to the Voodoo2."

"The Banshee's single-chip form factor dictated a 128-bit memory bus, like the first Voodoo. Performance wise, the Banshee was a mixed bag. In scenes which used multiple textures per polygon, the Voodoo2 was substantially faster, due to the second TMU. In scenes dominated by single-textured polygons, though, the Banshee would match (or even slightly exceed) the Voodoo2 due to its higher clock speed."

"While the 3D performance was somewhat of a disappointment, Banshee's 2D core was anything but. It rivaled the fastest 2D cores from Matrox, NVIDIA, and ATI. The chip was equipped with a 128-bit 2D GUI engine and a 128-bit VESA VBE 3.0 VGA core. It was perhaps the fastest MS-DOS performer released, certainly at the time. Windows performance was equally impressive. The graphics chip capably accelerated DirectDraw and supported all of the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) in hardware, with all 256 raster operations and tertiary functions, and had hardware polygon acceleration. All of this helped the 2D core be able to boast near-theoretical performance with a null driver test in Windows NT. 3dfx had indisputably fixed part of the weakness of the older Voodoo Rush."

3DFX BANSHEE SPECIFICATIONS

Manufacturer: 3dfx
GPU: Voodoo Banshee
Release Date: 1998-06-22
Interface: AGP 2X
Core Clock: 100 MHz
Memory Clock: 100 MHz
Memory Bandwidth: 1.6 GB/sec
Shader Operations: 100 Operations/sec
Pixel Fill Rate: 100 MPixels/sec
Texture Fill Rate: 100 MTexels/sec
Framebuffer: 16 MB
Memory Type: SDR
Memory Bus Type: 128 bit
Process: 350 nm
Fragment Pipelines: 1
Texture Units: 1


GENERAL SYSTEM INFORMATION

VIDEO CARD 2THEMAX 3DFX BANSHEE
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO
HERCULES SAVAGE3D
PROCESSOR AMD DURON 750MHZ
MOTHERBOARD JETWAY 663AS PRO
MEMORY 128MB PC-100 SDRAM
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS 98 SE
DIRECTX VERSION v8.0A


PCPLAYER DIRECT3D

640x480x16BIT

2THEMAX BANSHEE82
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO87
HERCULES SAVAGE3D92

640x480x32BIT

DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO72
HERCULES SAVAGE3D82

1024x768x16BIT

2THEMAX BANSHEE44
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO51
HERCULES SAVAGE3D55

1024x768x32BIT

DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO41
HERCULES SAVAGE3D40

2THEMAX BANSHEE DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO HERCULES SAVAGE3D

COMMENT - "The Hercules Savage3D puts in a great performance and actually outperforms the Diamond Savage4 Pro by 13% and the 2THEMAX Banshee by 20%. The reason there are no 32BIT results for the 2THEMAX Banshee is because it doesn't support 32BIT Colour only 16BIT."

WINTUNE 97

800x600x16BIT

2THEMAX BANSHEE171
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO117
HERCULES SAVAGE3D91

800x600x32BIT

DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO58
HERCULES SAVAGE3D55

2THEMAX BANSHEE DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO HERCULES SAVAGE3D

COMMENT - "2THEMAX Banshee puts in a great performance and shows it's 16BIT 2D pushing power beating the Diamond Savage4 Pro by 32% and Hercules Savage3D by 47%. When 32BIT is used which the 2THEMAX Banshee doesn't support the Diamond Savage4 Pro outperforms the Hercules Savage3D by 6%."

QUAKE 2

640x480x16BIT

2THEMAX BANSHEE72
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO77
HERCULES SAVAGE3D47

640x480x32BIT

DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO70
HERCULES SAVAGE3D33

1024x768x16BIT

2THEMAX BANSHEE36
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO35
HERCULES SAVAGE3D21

1024x768x32BIT

DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO31
HERCULES SAVAGE3D12

2THEMAX BANSHEE DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO HERCULES SAVAGE3D

COMMENT - "The Diamond Savage4 Pro puts in an AMAZING performance beating the Hercules Savage3D by 68% and drawing the 2THEMAX Banshee when using 16BIT."

QUAKE 3 ARENA

FASTEST

2THEMAX BANSHEE85
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO97
HERCULES SAVAGE3D47

NORMAL

2THEMAX BANSHEE48
DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO55
HERCULES SAVAGE3D30

2THEMAX BANSHEE DIAMOND SAVAGE4 PRO HERCULES SAVAGE3D

COMMENT - "The Diamond Savage4 Pro shows it's great gaming performance beating the 2THEMAX Banshee by 13% and the Hercules Savage3D by 52%."

CONCLUSION - "The 2THEMAX 3DFX Banshee has only limited AGP implementation, only one TMU per pipeline which results in lower performance compared to a Voodoo2 when using multi-textured games. The good points are the excellent stability, excellent quality 16BIT output and good performance. Out of the three video cards featured in this review the 2THEMAX 3DFX Banshee comes second with third place taken by the Hercules Savage3D. The real star of this review has to be the Diamond Savage4 Pro which was usually clearly faster than the 2THEMAX Banshee and Hercules Savage3D and unlike the 2THEMAX Banshee the Diamond Savage4 Pro can deliver crisp clear 32BIT graphics!"



LATEST REVIEWS

"Gigabyte Radeon HD 5670 review also featuring Gigabyte Radeon HD 4770. Gigabyte Radeon HD 5670 has 4% higher clock speed, 20% higher memory speed and Directx 11 Support."

"MSI Radeon HD 5670 review also featuring MSI Radeon HD 4670. MSI Radeon HD 5670 has 4% higher clock speed and 51% higher memory speed than the MSI Radeon HD 4670."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5670 review with Inno3D GeForce GT 240. Sapphire Radeon HD 5670 has 30% higher clock speed, 15% higher memory speed compared to Inno3D GeForce GT 240."

"The AMD Athlon II X2 240 Processor takes on the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800. AMD Athlon II X2 240 is a powerful 2.8Ghz Regor Socket AM2+ Processor which is compared to the Socket 939 2.4Ghz AMD Athlon64 X2 4800."

"Inno3D GeForce GT 240 review also featuring Powercolor Radeon HD 4770. Inno3D GeForce GT 240 has 27% lower clock speed, 6% faster memory speed and 544 less Shader Processors compared to the Powercolor Radeon HD 4770."

"Powercolor Radeon HD 4770 is compared to HIS Radeon HD 3870. Powercolor Radeon HD 4770 has 4% Lower Clock Speed, 30% Faster GDDR5 Memory and 320 Extra Shader Processors compared to HIS Radeon HD 3870."

"Gainward GeForce GT 240 review also featuring Asus GeForce 9600 GT. Gainward GeForce GT 240 has 27% lower clock speed, 42% higher memory speed and 32 extra Shader Processors compared to the Asus GeForce 9600 GT."

"MSI Radeon HD 5770 review also featuring Pov GeForce GTX 260. MSI Radeon HD 5770 has 33% higher clock speed, 59% higher memory speed and 584 extra Shader Processors compared to the Pov GeForce GTX 260."

"MSI Radeon HD 5970 review also features MSI GeForce GTX 295. MSI Radeon HD 5970 has 22% higher clock speed, 50% higher memory speed, 11% more memory and DirectX 11 Support compared to DirectX 10 with the MSI GeForce GTX 295."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5970 OC review also features Sapphire Radeon HD 5870. Sapphire Radeon HD 5970 OC has 14% lower clock speed, 17% lower memory speed but twice the Shader Processors."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5750 review also features Sapphire Radeon HD 5770. Sapphire Radeon HD 5750 has 18% lower clock speed, 5% lower memory speed and 10% less Shader Processors."

"Gigabyte Radeon HD 5750 review also features Gigabyte Radeon HD 4770. Gigabyte Radeon HD 5750 has 7% lower clock speed, 31% higher memory speed and 20% extra Shaders."

"Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 review also featuring Gainward Radeon HD 4870. Sapphire Radeon HD 5770 has 11% higher clock speed and 25% higher memory speed compared to the Gainward Radeon HD 4870."

ULTIMATE HARDWARE = EMAIL - LINKS - NEWS - SITEMAP - FACEBOOK - MYSPACE - TWITTER

COPYRIGHT © 2002 - 2010 ULTIMATE HARDWARE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

SEARCH ULTIMATE HARDWARE