CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO REVIEW
"Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro review also featuring the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO. The Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro is the latest mainstream video card from ATI featuring the R570 GPU which has 36 pixel shaders. The Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro was tested with 3dmark 2006."
|
| BENCHMARK SETTINGS:- We use two different image quality and resolution settings when we benchmark computer hardware for review. Medium quality setting uses a resolution of 1280x1024 (unless otherwise stated) and all of the game settings are set to medium, this setting will test both the processor and video performance. High quality setting uses a resolution of 1600x1200 (unless otherwise stated) and all of the game settings are set to high, this setting is a very demanding test for video rather processor performance! |
3DMARK 2006FINAL SCORE
SM2.0
SM3.0
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO |
COMMENT - "The Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro simply blows away the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO with a massive 1557 point or 36% victory. Unlike the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO which has a SM3.0 performance less than it's performance for SM2.0 the Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro's SM3.0 performance actually increased by 17%." |
3DMARK 2006 GAMESRETURN TO PROXYCON
FIREFLY FOREST
CANYON FLIGHT (HDR)
DEEP FREEZE (HDR)
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO |
COMMENT - "After the excellent 3dmark 2006 performance shown by the Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro we should expect a big performance advantage over the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO. The 36 pixel shaders really help the performance with 3dmark 2006's games and the Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro is between 39% to 50% faster." |
3DMARK 2006 FILL RATESINGLE-TEXTURING
MULTI-TEXTURING
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO |
COMMENT - "The Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro should deliver 28% more memory bandwidth compared to the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO, let's see if this 3dmark 2006 Fill-Rate benchmark backs this up. When using Single-Texturing the Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro can deliver 21% more bandwidth and using Multi-Texturing it can deliver 13%." |
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO REVIEW |
| PAGE 1 - INTRODUCTION |
| PAGE 2 - SYSTEM INFORMATION AND 3DMARK 2006 |
| PAGE 3 - 3DMARK 2005, PCMARK 2005, RIGHTMARK AND SHADERMARK |
| PAGE 4 - DOOM 3, FAR CRY HDR AND GT LEGEND |
| PAGE 5 - PREY, QUAKE 4 AND SERIOUS SAM 2 |
| PAGE 6 - SUPREME COMMANDER |
| PAGE 7 - OTHER ATI VIDEO CARDS AND CONCLUSION |
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
I hope you enjoy my reviews on ati video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new ati video card that's right for your computing needs
LATEST REVIEWS
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
AMD ATHLON II X2 265
POWERCOLOR RADEON 5770
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
AMD ATHLON II X2 255
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970
MSI GEFORCE GTX 570
ZOTAC GEFORCE GTX 580
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6870