ULTIMATE HARDWARE

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO REVIEW

"Sapphire Radeon x1950 Pro 512MB review also featuring Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro, Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO and Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO. Benchmarked with 3dmark 2001 SE, 3dmark 2003, 3dmark 2005, 3dmark 2006, Prey, Doom3 and Quake4."

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO BOX


SYSTEM INFORMATION
VIDEO CARD SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO
ATI DRIVER CATALYST v8.6
PROCESSOR AMD ATHLON64 3500
MOTHERBOARD ASROCK 939 DUAL SATA 2
MEMORY 2 x 1GB OCUK PC3200 DDR
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 3
DIRECTX v9.0c

3DMARK 2001 SE

FINAL SCORE

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO23090
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO22844
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO22742
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO21958

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO

COMMENT - "The Sapphire Radeon x1950 Pro outperforms the Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro by 2%, the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO by 2% and the Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO by 5%."
COMMENT - "Even though 3dmark 2001 SE is 7 years old it will still be useful for testing the video card although 3dmark 2001 SE is more processor rather than video card limited with these video cards. "

3DMARK 2003

FINAL SCORE

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO14627
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO14206
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO12124
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO10502

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO

COMMENT - "The Sapphire Radeon x1950 Pro outperforms the Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro by 3%, the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO by 18% and the Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO by 29%."
COMMENT - "3dmark 2003 is more modern compared to the earlier 3dmark 2001 SE which is well known for making limited use of the processor so it will be a good benchmark for the video cards."

3DMARK 2005

FINAL SCORE

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO8822
CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO8655
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO6554
SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO5006

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO CONNECT3D RADEON X1950 PRO
SAPPHIRE RADEON X1800 GTO SAPPHIRE RADEON X800 GTO

COMMENT - "The Sapphire Radeon x1950 Pro outperforms the Connect3D Radeon x1950 Pro by 2%, the Sapphire Radeon x1800 GTO by 26% and the Sapphire Radeon x800 GTO by 44%."
COMMENT - "3dmark 2005 is more demanding than 3dmark 2003 and introduced some important changes including full SM3.0 and HDR."

SAPPHIRE RADEON X1950 PRO REVIEW

PAGE 1 - INTRODUCTION
PAGE 2 - 3DMARK 2001 SE, 3DMARK 2003 AND 3DMARK 2005
PAGE 3 - 3DMARK 2006 - FILL RATE, GAMES AND PIXEL SHADERS
PAGE 4 - DOOM 3, PREY, QUAKE 4 AND FINAL RESULT

HOME = CPU - MOTHERBOARD - NEWS - 3D BENCH - SITEMAP - TECH - VIDEO CARD - BYTE NEWS - BLOG - LINKS

COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

I hope you enjoy my reviews on ati video cards, be sure to use this information when picking out a new ati video card that's right for your computing needs

LATEST REVIEWS

AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970