ULTIMATE HARDWARE

AMD ATHLON64 3000 WITH SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 3870 PERFORMANCE

"AMD Athlon64 3000 and Athlon64 X2 4200 game performance with a Sapphire Radeon HD 3870. We are going to find out if the Sapphire Radeon HD 3870 requires a powerful processor like the Athlon64 X2 4200 or if the Sapphire Radeon HD 3870 will run well with even a 1.8 Ghz Athlon64 3000. We will be using various benchmarks to show processor and video card performance but in the main we will be using game benchmarks. These include Lost Planet, World in Conflict, Supreme Commander - Forged Alliance, Crysis, Trackmania Nations Forever and Sins of a Solar Empire."


SYSTEM INFORMATION
PROCESSOR AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200
AMD ATHLON64 3000
VIDEO CARD SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 3870
ATI DRIVER CATALYST v8.6
MOTHERBOARD ASROCK 939 DUAL SATA 2
MEMORY 2 x 1GB OCUK PC3200 DDR
OPERATING SYSTEM WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 3
DIRECTX v9.0c

LIGHTSPEED

1024x768

AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200115
AMD ATHLON64 3000104

1280x1024

AMD ATHLON64 X2 420092
AMD ATHLON64 300082

1600x1200

AMD ATHLON64 X2 420081
AMD ATHLON64 300070

AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200 AMD ATHLON64 3000

COMMENT - "Lighspeed is a very video rather than processor limited benchmark so it's no surprise that the Athlon64 3000 is close to the performance of Athlon64 X2 4200."

CINEBENCH 10

AMD ATHLON64 X2 42003734
AMD ATHLON64 30003122

AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200 AMD ATHLON64 3000

COMMENT - "Cinebench 10 is a fairly old benchmark and the Athlon64 3000 is only 16% slower than the Athlon64 X2 4200."

SHADERMARK

SM3.0

AMD ATHLON64 X2 420035004
AMD ATHLON64 300034968

AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200 AMD ATHLON64 3000

COMMENT - "Shadermark is a VERY video card limited benchmark and makes no use of the processor so it's not surprise that the results are the same. What this means is the Athlon64 3000 is fast enough for the Sapphire Radeon HD 3870."

PASSMARK

2D GRAPHICS MARK

AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200415
AMD ATHLON64 3000398

3D GRAPHICS MARK

AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200696
AMD ATHLON64 3000655

AMD ATHLON64 X2 4200 AMD ATHLON64 3000

COMMENT - "We have selected only the video card related benchmarks and it shows that the lower speed of the Athlon64 3000 is limiting the Sapphire Radeon HD 3870 2D performance rather than it's 3D performance. The Athlon64 X2 4200 outperforms the Athlon64 3000 by 17% with 2D and by 6% using the 3D benchmarks."
PAGE 1 - INTRODUCTION
PAGE 2 - SYSTEM INFORMATION AND 3DMARK 2006
PAGE 3 - LIGHT SPEED, CINEBENCH 10, SHADERMARK AND PASS MARK
PAGE 4 - DOOM 3, PREY AND LOST PLANET
PAGE 5 - WORLD IN CONFLICT, SUPREME COMMANDER AND CRYSIS
PAGE 5 - TRACKMANIA FOREVER, SINS OF A SOLAR EMPIRE AND FINAL RESULT

HOME = CPU - MOTHERBOARD - NEWS - 3D BENCH - SITEMAP - TECH - VIDEO CARD - BYTE NEWS - BLOG - LINKS

COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

I hope you enjoy my reviews on amd processors, be sure to use this information when picking out a new amd processor that's right for your computing needs

LATEST REVIEWS

AMD FX 6100 VS AMD FX 8150
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970