FOUR 939 AMD PROCESSORS REVIEW
"Dual Core Processors we feature the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 and AMD Athlon64 X2 3800. Single Core Processors we feature the AMD Athlon64 4000 and AMD Athlon64 3000. We tested the Processors with 3dmark 2001, 3dmark 2006, Nuclearus and Performance Test."
| SYSTEM INFORMATION | |
| PROCESSOR | AMD ATHLON64 X2 4800 |
| AMD ATHLON64 X2 3800 | |
| AMD ATHLON64 4000 | |
| AMD ATHLON64 3000 | |
| MOTHERBOARD | ECS NFORCE4 A939 |
| VIDEO CARD | HIS RADEON HD 3870 |
| ATI DRIVER | CATALYST v9.12 |
| MEMORY | 2 x 1GB OCUK PC3200 DDR |
| OPERATING SYSTEM | WINDOWS XP SERVICE PACK 3 |
| DIRECTX | v9.0c |
3DMARK 2001FINAL SCORE
AMD ATHLON64 X2 4800 AMD ATHLON64 X2 3800 |
COMMENT - "We are using the older 3dmark 2001 benchmark to show performance more in line with Single Core Processors. The AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 beats the AMD Athlon64 4000 by 10%. Here we see that the AMD Athlon64 4000 is able to outperform the AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 by 5%. The AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 outperforms the AMD Athlon64 3000 by 19%. The only thing we can take from these 3dmark 2001 results is that the fastest Single Core Processor beats the slowest Dual Core Processor." |
3DMARK 2006FINAL SCORE
CPU SCORE
AMD ATHLON64 X2 4800 AMD ATHLON64 X2 3800 |
COMMENT - "3dmark 2006 is much more demanding than 3dmark 2001 and makes good use of Dual Core Technology which means the Dual Core Processors have an advantage. Using the 3dmark 2006 Final Score the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 beats the AMD Athlon64 4000 by 27%, the AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 beats the AMD Athlon64 4000 by 16% and also beats the AMD Athlon64 3000 by 35%. When using the 3dmark 2006 CPU Score the Dual Core Processors put the squeeze on the Single Core Processors even more for a very convincing victory." |
NUCLEARUS MULTI COREOVERALL
ALU
FPU
MULTI THREAD
AMD ATHLON64 X2 4800 AMD ATHLON64 X2 3800 |
COMMENT - "Nuclearus Multi Core Benchmark favours Dual Core especially with it's Multi Thread Benchmark. I will just focus on the Overall and Multi Thread Benchmarks. ALU and FPU are decided by the Core Clock Speeds so if the Processor is running faster it will be faster. We start off with the Multi Thread Benchmark, the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 beats the AMD Athlon64 4000 by 41% and the AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 beats the AMD Athlon64 3000 by 47%. Overall the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 beats the AMD Athlon64 4000 by 29% and the AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 beats the AMD Athlon64 3000 by 31%. An interesting result is that AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 beats the AMD Athlon64 4000 by 15%." |
PERFORMANCE TESTCPU MARK
2D GRAPHICS
3D GRAPHICS
FINAL PASSMARK
AMD ATHLON64 X2 4800 AMD ATHLON64 X2 3800 |
COMMENT - "Performance Test makes great use of Dual Core Technology so it was expected that the gap between the Dual Core Processors the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 and AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 would be quite wide compared to the Single Core Processors the AMD Athlon64 4000 and AMD Athlon64 3000. The 2D Graphics results are CPU limited and the 3D Graphics results are Video Card Limited so we will be ignoring them. We shall start off with the CPU Mark and here the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 beats the AMD Athlon64 4000 by 50% and the AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 beats the AMD Athlon64 3000 by 55%. Using the Final Passmark the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800 beats AMD Athlon64 4000 by 37% and AMD Athlon64 X2 3800 beats AMD Athlon64 3000 by 34%." |
FOUR 939 AMD PROCESSORS REVIEW INDEX
| PAGE 1 - FOUR AMD 939 PROCESSORS INTRODUCTION |
| PAGE 2 - 3DMARK 2001, 3DMARK 2006, NUCLEARUS AND PERF TEST |
| PAGE 3 - AQUAMARK3 AND LIGHTSMARK |
| PAGE 4 - BATMAN ARKHAM ASYLUM, RESIDENT EVIL 5 AND LAST REMNANT |
COPYRIGHT © 2012 SEO101UK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
I hope you enjoy my reviews on amd processors, be sure to use this information when picking out a new amd processor that's right for your computing needs
LATEST REVIEWS
HIS RADEON HD 7950
AMD A6 3650 VS ATHLON X3 455
ASUS RADEON HD 7970
AMD PHENOM II X4 960T
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 7970
AMD A6 3650 VS AMD A8 3850
AMD A8 3850 VS ATHLON X3 455
INTEL CORE i5 2500 VS FX 8150
AMD FX 8150 VS X6 1100T
PHENOM II X6 1100T VS i5 2500K
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS CORE i3 530
INTEL CORE i3 530 VS AMD X3 455
INTEL CORE i3 2100 VS AMD X3 455
CORE i5 2500K VS PHENOM II 970
AMD PHENOM II X4 970 VS X4 955
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X4 620
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 560
AMD ATHLON II X3 455 VS X2 265
AMD ATHLON II X3 455
AMD ATHLON II X3 435
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 645
AMD PHENOM II X2 560 VS X4 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 955
CORE i3 2120 VS PHENOM II 560
INTEL CORE i3 2120
AMD ATHLON II X4 620
AMD PHENOM II X4 955
AMD PHENOM II X2 560
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6850
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6770
HIS RADEON HD 6850
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 460 SONIC
POWERCOLOR RADEON 6790
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 550
PALIT GEFORCE GTX 560
AMD ATHLON II X4 645
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450 SONIC
PALIT GEFORCE GTS 450
SAPPHIRE RADEON HD 6970